Suppr超能文献

血管活性药物评分:演变、临床应用及陷阱

Vasoactive-Inotropic Score: Evolution, Clinical Utility, and Pitfalls.

作者信息

Belletti Alessandro, Lerose Caterina Cecilia, Zangrillo Alberto, Landoni Giovanni

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.

Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2021 Oct;35(10):3067-3077. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2020.09.117. Epub 2020 Sep 22.

Abstract

Inotropes and vasopressors frequently are administered in critically ill and perioperative patients. However, clinical practice is highly variable across clinicians and institutions. The inotropic score and its upgrade "vasoactive-inotropic score" (VIS) can be used to objectively quantify the degree of hemodynamic support. Several studies demonstrated a correlation between high VIS and poor outcome. Furthermore, VIS can help compare different clinical and research experiences. Several recently developed scores include VIS in their model, although they still require independent validation. Conversely, VIS has several pitfalls, including the fact that a universally recognized version that includes all commonly used vasoactive drugs does not exist. In this review, the authors summarize all the VIS, VIS-related, and VIS-validating manuscripts, and suggest a new updated version of VIS that also includes terlipressin, methylene blue, and angiotensin II.

摘要

强心剂和血管升压药常用于危重症患者和围手术期患者。然而,临床医生和医疗机构之间的临床实践差异很大。肌力评分及其升级版“血管活性-肌力评分”(VIS)可用于客观量化血流动力学支持的程度。多项研究表明高VIS与不良预后之间存在相关性。此外,VIS有助于比较不同的临床和研究经验。最近开发的几个评分模型中包含了VIS,尽管它们仍需独立验证。相反,VIS存在一些缺陷,包括不存在一个包含所有常用血管活性药物的公认版本。在这篇综述中,作者总结了所有与VIS、VIS相关以及验证VIS的手稿,并提出了一个新的更新版VIS,其中还包括特利加压素、亚甲蓝和血管紧张素II。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验