Çağlayan Berna Çağla, Keskin Aylin, Gür Kabul Elif, Başakcı Çalık Bilge, Baş Aslan Ummuhan, Karasu Uğur
School of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey.
Department of Rheumatology, Pamukkale University, School of Medicine, Denizli, Turkey.
Eur J Rheumatol. 2021 Jul;8(3):150-155. doi: 10.5152/eurjrheum.2020.20037.
This study aimed to investigate the effects of clinical Pilates exercises in patients with fibromyalgia (FM) and to compare the effects of one-to-one and group-based exercise methods.
A total of 42 women (mean age, 50.90±7.78 years) with FM were included. The participants were randomly divided into 2 groups (one-to-one exercise, n=16; group-based exercise, n=26). Disease impact was evaluated with the FM Impact Questionnaire, functional status with the Health Assessment Questionnaire, anxiety with the Beck Anxiety Inventory, quality of life with short form-36, and biopsychosocial status with the Bilişsel Egzersiz Terapi Yaklaşımı-biopsychosocial questionnaire. All the evaluations were performed pre- and post-treatment. Clinical Pilates exercises were carried out 2 days a week for 6 weeks.
When the pre- and post-treatment data were compared, significant improvement was seen in all parameters in the group-based exercise group; in the one-to-one exercise group, improvement was noted in disease impact, quality of life, and biopsychosocial status. When post-treatment data were compared, only disease impact was significant for the one-to-one exercise group. Effect size results were found to be moderate and high for both methods.
For clinical Pilates exercise in FM, one-to-one method was suggested to have high disease impact and low quality of life, whereas group-based exercise method showed high anxiety.
本研究旨在调查临床普拉提运动对纤维肌痛(FM)患者的影响,并比较一对一和小组运动方法的效果。
共纳入42名患有FM的女性(平均年龄50.90±7.78岁)。参与者被随机分为两组(一对一运动组,n = 16;小组运动组,n = 26)。使用纤维肌痛影响问卷评估疾病影响,使用健康评估问卷评估功能状态,使用贝克焦虑量表评估焦虑,使用简短形式-36评估生活质量,使用认知行为疗法-生物心理社会问卷评估生物心理社会状态。所有评估均在治疗前后进行。临床普拉提运动每周进行2天,共6周。
比较治疗前后的数据时,小组运动组的所有参数均有显著改善;在一对一运动组中,疾病影响、生活质量和生物心理社会状态有所改善。比较治疗后的数据时,一对一运动组仅疾病影响有显著差异。两种方法的效应量结果均为中等和高。
对于FM患者的临床普拉提运动,一对一方法对疾病影响较大但生活质量较低,而小组运动方法显示焦虑程度较高。