Suppr超能文献

布洛芬与对乙酰氨基酚固定剂量复方制剂治疗成人急性术后疼痛的疗效和安全性:Meta 分析和试验序贯分析。

Efficacy and Safety of Ibuprofen Plus Paracetamol in a Fixed-Dose Combination for Acute Postoperative Pain in Adults: Meta-Analysis and a Trial Sequential Analysis.

机构信息

Drug Information Department, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.

School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

CNS Drugs. 2021 Jan;35(1):105-120. doi: 10.1007/s40263-020-00777-7. Epub 2021 Jan 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ibuprofen and paracetamol (acetaminophen) are very commonly used for analgesia and pain. In 2020, the US FDA gave its first approval of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) of the two drugs in the same tablet for postoperative pain. There has been no quantitative, summative analysis of the FDC effect size measures against postoperative pain in adults. Similar analyses exist, but only in pediatric patients.

OBJECTIVE

This was the first meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety outcomes of the ibuprofen/paracetamol FDC against placebo, administered postoperatively, for moderate to severe pain relief in adults.

METHODS

The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases, in addition to the grey literature, were searched for clinical trials until April 2020, to identify comparative literature studies of the ibuprofen/paracetamol FDC in acute postoperative pain in adults. No restrictions on doses, formulations (oral, intravenous), and underlying type of surgery were applied. Independent reviewers performed the study selection, data extraction, and the risk-of-bias and quality-of-evidence assessments based on the Cochrane criteria. The outcome measures of interest in the meta-analysis were ≥ 50% pain relief , need for rescue medications, and occurrence of adverse drug events. Statistical analyses using a random-effects model were performed, at a statistical significance of p < 0.05. The RevMan software was used for analysis. A trial sequential analysis (TSA) was conducted to assess how precise and conclusive the meta-analysis outcomes are.

RESULTS

Seven double-blind, randomized controlled trials with 2947 participants were included. The FDC dose was at three different levels: 75-100 mg ibuprofen/250 mg paracetamol, 150-200 mg ibuprofen/500 mg paracetamol (FDA-approved dose level), and 292.5-400 mg ibuprofen/975-1000 mg paracetamol. The ≥ 50% pain relief outcome was more achieved with the FDC compared to placebo (risk ratio [RR] 2.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.11-3.20, p < 0.00001), as was the reduced need for rescue medications (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.37-0.71, p < 0.0001). While inconclusive based on TSA, the FDC was at the highest doses at least as well tolerated as placebo regarding the occurrence of adverse events, including severe, common, and treatment-related adverse events, as well as those that lead to discontinuation, but it was also significantly associated with lower rates of headache and nausea. Subgroup analyses confirmed that the efficacy and safety of the FDC were maintained regardless of doses and formulations. The sensitivity analysis confirmed outcomes against potential publication bias and identified sources of heterogeneity in analyses.

CONCLUSION

The ibuprofen plus paracetamol FDC is conclusively an effective analgesic against placebo in acute postoperative, moderate to severe pain in adults. It is also superiorly well tolerated, including at the higher dose of 292.5-400 mg ibuprofen/975-1000 mg paracetamol; however, safety outcomes were inconclusive. Future studies need to confirm the safety of FDC and its benefits against other marketed analgesics in postoperative pain.

摘要

背景

布洛芬和对乙酰氨基酚(扑热息痛)是非常常用的镇痛和止痛药物。2020 年,美国 FDA 首次批准了这两种药物的固定剂量组合(FDC),在同一片剂中用于术后疼痛。目前还没有对 FDC 治疗成人术后疼痛的效果大小进行定量、总结性分析。类似的分析存在,但只存在于儿科患者中。

目的

这是首次荟萃分析,比较了 FDC 与安慰剂在术后用于缓解中度至重度疼痛的疗效和安全性结局,研究对象为成人。

方法

检索 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 中央数据库,以及灰色文献,以确定 2020 年 4 月之前关于 FDC 治疗成人急性术后疼痛的比较文献研究。不限制剂量、制剂(口服、静脉)和手术类型。独立评审员根据 Cochrane 标准进行研究选择、数据提取以及偏倚风险和证据质量评估。荟萃分析的主要结局指标是≥50%疼痛缓解、需要抢救药物和发生药物不良反应。使用随机效应模型进行统计学分析,以 p<0.05 为统计学显著性。使用 RevMan 软件进行分析。进行试验序贯分析(TSA)以评估荟萃分析结果的精确性和结论性。

结果

纳入了 7 项双盲、随机对照试验,共 2947 名参与者。FDC 剂量有三种不同水平:75-100mg 布洛芬/250mg 对乙酰氨基酚、150-200mg 布洛芬/500mg 对乙酰氨基酚(FDA 批准的剂量水平)和 292.5-400mg 布洛芬/975-1000mg 对乙酰氨基酚。与安慰剂相比,FDC 更能达到≥50%的疼痛缓解(风险比[RR]2.60,95%置信区间[CI]2.11-3.20,p<0.00001),也减少了对抢救药物的需求(RR 0.51,95%CI 0.37-0.71,p<0.0001)。虽然基于 TSA 尚不确定,但 FDC 在最高剂量下与安慰剂一样耐受良好,关于不良反应的发生,包括严重、常见和与治疗相关的不良反应,以及导致停药的不良反应,但它也显著降低了头痛和恶心的发生率。亚组分析证实,无论剂量和制剂如何,FDC 的疗效和安全性均得以维持。敏感性分析证实了对潜在发表偏倚的结果,并确定了分析中的异质性来源。

结论

在治疗成人急性、中度至重度术后疼痛方面,布洛芬加对乙酰氨基酚 FDC 明显优于安慰剂。它也具有良好的耐受性,包括更高剂量的 292.5-400mg 布洛芬/975-1000mg 对乙酰氨基酚;然而,安全性结果尚不确定。未来的研究需要确认 FDC 的安全性及其在术后疼痛方面相对于其他市售镇痛药的益处。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验