Department of Systems Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
Ann Oncol. 2021 May;32(5):661-672. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.02.006. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
High tumor mutation burden (TMB-H) has been proposed as a predictive biomarker for response to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB), largely due to the potential for tumor mutations to generate immunogenic neoantigens. Despite recent pan-cancer approval of ICB treatment for any TMB-H tumor, as assessed by the targeted FoundationOne CDx assay in nine tumor types, the utility of this biomarker has not been fully demonstrated across all cancers.
Data from over 10 000 patient tumors included in The Cancer Genome Atlas were used to compare approaches to determine TMB and identify the correlation between predicted neoantigen load and CD8 T cells. Association of TMB with ICB treatment outcomes was analyzed by both objective response rates (ORRs, N = 1551) and overall survival (OS, N = 1936).
In cancer types where CD8 T-cell levels positively correlated with neoantigen load, such as melanoma, lung, and bladder cancers, TMB-H tumors exhibited a 39.8% ORR to ICB [95% confidence interval (CI) 34.9-44.8], which was significantly higher than that observed in low TMB (TMB-L) tumors [odds ratio (OR) = 4.1, 95% CI 2.9-5.8, P < 2 × 10]. In cancer types that showed no relationship between CD8 T-cell levels and neoantigen load, such as breast cancer, prostate cancer, and glioma, TMB-H tumors failed to achieve a 20% ORR (ORR = 15.3%, 95% CI 9.2-23.4, P = 0.95), and exhibited a significantly lower ORR relative to TMB-L tumors (OR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.24-0.88, P = 0.02). Bulk ORRs were not significantly different between the two categories of tumors (P = 0.10) for patient cohorts assessed. Equivalent results were obtained by analyzing OS and by treating TMB as a continuous variable.
Our analysis failed to support application of TMB-H as a biomarker for treatment with ICB in all solid cancer types. Further tumor type-specific studies are warranted.
高肿瘤突变负担(TMB-H)已被提议作为对免疫检查点阻断(ICB)反应的预测生物标志物,这主要是由于肿瘤突变可能产生免疫原性新抗原。尽管最近在九种肿瘤类型中通过靶向 FoundationOne CDx 检测评估的任何 TMB-H 肿瘤均获得了 ICB 治疗的泛癌症批准,但该生物标志物在所有癌症中的应用尚未得到充分证实。
使用包含在癌症基因组图谱中的超过 10000 例患者肿瘤的数据,用于比较确定 TMB 的方法,并确定预测的新抗原负荷与 CD8 T 细胞之间的相关性。通过客观缓解率(ORR,N=1551)和总生存期(OS,N=1936)分析 TMB 与 ICB 治疗结果的相关性。
在 CD8 T 细胞水平与新抗原负荷呈正相关的癌症类型中,如黑色素瘤、肺癌和膀胱癌,TMB-H 肿瘤对 ICB 的客观缓解率(ORR)为 39.8%(95%CI 34.9-44.8),明显高于 TMB-L 肿瘤(优势比(OR)=4.1,95%CI 2.9-5.8,P<2×10)。在 CD8 T 细胞水平与新抗原负荷之间没有关系的癌症类型中,如乳腺癌、前列腺癌和神经胶质瘤,TMB-H 肿瘤未能达到 20%的 ORR(ORR=15.3%,95%CI 9.2-23.4,P=0.95),并且与 TMB-L 肿瘤相比,ORR 明显降低(OR=0.46,95%CI 0.24-0.88,P=0.02)。对于评估的患者队列,两种类型的肿瘤之间的总体 ORR 无显著差异(P=0.10)。通过分析 OS 和将 TMB 视为连续变量,得到了等效的结果。
我们的分析未能支持将 TMB-H 作为所有实体癌类型接受 ICB 治疗的生物标志物。需要进一步进行肿瘤类型特异性研究。