Exercise Intervention for Health Research Group (EXINH-RG), Department of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Pain Med. 2022 Oct 29;23(11):1837-1850. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnac077.
To assess the effects of pain neuroscience education (PNE) on patients with fibromyalgia in terms of pain intensity, fibromyalgia impact, anxiety, and pain catastrophizing.
A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was conducted. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated with RStudio software (RStudio, Boston, MA) for relevant outcomes and were pooled in a meta-analysis with the random effects model.
A total of eight studies were included. The meta-analysis showed statistically significant differences in pain intensity with a moderate clinical effect in seven studies at the post-intervention assessment (SMD: -0.76; 95% CI: -1.33 to -0.19; P < 0.05) with evidence of significant heterogeneity (P < 0.05, I2 = 92%), but it did not show statistically significant differences in fibromyalgia impact, anxiety, and pain catastrophizing (P > 0.05). With regard to the follow-up assessment, only the fibromyalgia impact showed significant improvements, with a very small clinical effect in nine studies (SMD: -0.44; 95% CI: -0.73 to -0.14; P < 0.05) and evidence of significant heterogeneity (P < 0.05, I2 = 80%). After the application of a sensitivity analysis with the PNE face-to-face interventions, the meta-analysis showed a significant decrease in pain intensity, with a moderate clinical effect at the post-intervention and follow-up assessments without evidence of significant heterogeneity (P < 0.05, I2 = 10%).
There is low-quality evidence that in patients with fibromyalgia, PNE can decrease the pain intensity in the post-intervention period and the fibromyalgia impact in the follow-up period. However, it appears that PNE showed no effect on anxiety and pain catastrophizing.
评估疼痛神经科学教育(PNE)对纤维肌痛患者疼痛强度、纤维肌痛影响、焦虑和疼痛灾难化的影响。
对随机对照试验进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。使用 RStudio 软件(波士顿的 RStudio)计算相关结局的标准化均数差(SMD)和 95%置信区间(CI),并采用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。
共纳入 8 项研究。荟萃分析显示,在 7 项干预后评估的研究中,疼痛强度具有统计学显著差异和中等临床效果(SMD:-0.76;95%CI:-1.33 至-0.19;P < 0.05),且存在显著异质性(P < 0.05,I2 = 92%),但在纤维肌痛影响、焦虑和疼痛灾难化方面无统计学显著差异(P > 0.05)。在随访评估中,仅在 9 项研究中发现纤维肌痛影响显著改善,具有非常小的临床效果(SMD:-0.44;95%CI:-0.73 至-0.14;P < 0.05),且存在显著异质性(P < 0.05,I2 = 80%)。在应用 PNE 面对面干预的敏感性分析后,荟萃分析显示疼痛强度在干预后和随访时显著下降,且无显著异质性(P < 0.05,I2 = 10%),具有中等临床效果。
证据质量低表明,在纤维肌痛患者中,PNE 可以在干预后时期降低疼痛强度,并在随访时期降低纤维肌痛影响。然而,PNE 似乎对焦虑和疼痛灾难化没有影响。