Suppr超能文献

二线 axicabtagene ciloleucel 在复发难治性弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤中的成本效益。

Cost-effectiveness of second-line axicabtagene ciloleucel in relapsed refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

机构信息

Department of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA.

Center for Digestive Health, Penn Medicine Princeton Medical Center, Plainsboro, NJ.

出版信息

Blood. 2022 Nov 10;140(19):2024-2036. doi: 10.1182/blood.2022016747.

Abstract

The ZUMA-7 (Efficacy of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel Compared to Standard of Care Therapy in Subjects With Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma) study showed that axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) improved event-free survival (EFS) compared with standard of care (SOC) salvage chemoimmunotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplant in primary refractory/early relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL); this led to its recent US Food and Drug Administration approval in this setting. We modeled a hypothetical cohort of US adults (mean age, 65 years) with primary refractory/early relapsed DLBCL by developing a Markov model (lifetime horizon) to model the cost-effectiveness of second-line axi-cel compared with SOC using a range of plausible long-term outcomes. EFS and OS were estimated from ZUMA-7. Outcome measures were reported in incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, with a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $150 000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). Assuming a 5-year EFS of 35% with second-line axi-cel and 10% with SOC, axi-cel was cost-effective at a WTP of $150 000 per QALY ($93 547 per QALY). axi-cel was no longer cost-effective if its 5-year EFS was ≤26.4% or if it cost more than $972 061 at a WTP of $150 000. Second-line axi-cel was the cost-effective strategy in 73% of the 10 000 Monte Carlo iterations at a WTP of $150 000. If the absolute benefit in EFS is maintained over time, second-line axi-cel for aggressive relapsed/refractory DLBCL is cost-effective compared with SOC at a WTP of $150 000 per QALY. However, its cost-effectiveness is highly dependent on long-term outcomes. Routine use of second-line chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy would add significantly to health care expenditures in the United States (more than $1 billion each year), even when used in a high-risk subpopulation. Further reductions in the cost of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy are needed to be affordable in many regions of the world.

摘要

ZUMA-7(阿基仑赛对比标准治疗在复发/难治弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤受试者中的疗效)研究表明,与标准挽救性化疗免疫治疗后自体干细胞移植相比,阿基仑赛(axi-cel)改善了原发性难治/早期复发弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)患者的无事件生存(EFS);这导致其最近在美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准用于该适应证。我们通过建立一个马尔可夫模型(终生)来模拟一个假设的美国成年人队列(平均年龄 65 岁),以对二线 axi-cel 与标准治疗相比的成本效益进行建模,使用了一系列合理的长期结果。ZUMA-7 中估计了 EFS 和 OS。通过增量成本效益比报告结果,愿意支付(WTP)阈值为每质量调整生命年(QALY)15 万美元。假设二线 axi-cel 的 5 年 EFS 为 35%,SOC 为 10%,则在 WTP 为每 QALY 15 万美元时,axi-cel 具有成本效益(每 QALY 93547 美元)。如果其 5 年 EFS 小于等于 26.4%,或者如果在 WTP 为 15 万美元时成本超过 972061 美元,则 axi-cel 不再具有成本效益。在 WTP 为 15 万美元时,10000 次蒙特卡罗迭代中有 73%的情况下,二线 axi-cel 是一种具有成本效益的策略。如果 EFS 的绝对获益随时间保持,则与 SOC 相比,二线 axi-cel 用于侵袭性复发/难治性 DLBCL 在 WTP 为每 QALY 15 万美元时具有成本效益。然而,其成本效益高度依赖于长期结果。在美国,常规使用二线嵌合抗原受体 T 细胞治疗将显著增加医疗保健支出(每年超过 10 亿美元),即使在高危亚群中使用也是如此。需要进一步降低嵌合抗原受体 T 细胞治疗的成本,以便在世界许多地区负担得起。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc88/9837443/4b6b92bcc4fc/BLOOD_BLD-2022-016747-fx1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验