Department of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA.
Center for Digestive Health, Penn Medicine Princeton Medical Center, Plainsboro, NJ.
Blood. 2022 Nov 10;140(19):2024-2036. doi: 10.1182/blood.2022016747.
The ZUMA-7 (Efficacy of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel Compared to Standard of Care Therapy in Subjects With Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma) study showed that axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) improved event-free survival (EFS) compared with standard of care (SOC) salvage chemoimmunotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplant in primary refractory/early relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL); this led to its recent US Food and Drug Administration approval in this setting. We modeled a hypothetical cohort of US adults (mean age, 65 years) with primary refractory/early relapsed DLBCL by developing a Markov model (lifetime horizon) to model the cost-effectiveness of second-line axi-cel compared with SOC using a range of plausible long-term outcomes. EFS and OS were estimated from ZUMA-7. Outcome measures were reported in incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, with a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $150 000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). Assuming a 5-year EFS of 35% with second-line axi-cel and 10% with SOC, axi-cel was cost-effective at a WTP of $150 000 per QALY ($93 547 per QALY). axi-cel was no longer cost-effective if its 5-year EFS was ≤26.4% or if it cost more than $972 061 at a WTP of $150 000. Second-line axi-cel was the cost-effective strategy in 73% of the 10 000 Monte Carlo iterations at a WTP of $150 000. If the absolute benefit in EFS is maintained over time, second-line axi-cel for aggressive relapsed/refractory DLBCL is cost-effective compared with SOC at a WTP of $150 000 per QALY. However, its cost-effectiveness is highly dependent on long-term outcomes. Routine use of second-line chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy would add significantly to health care expenditures in the United States (more than $1 billion each year), even when used in a high-risk subpopulation. Further reductions in the cost of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy are needed to be affordable in many regions of the world.
ZUMA-7(阿基仑赛对比标准治疗在复发/难治弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤受试者中的疗效)研究表明,与标准挽救性化疗免疫治疗后自体干细胞移植相比,阿基仑赛(axi-cel)改善了原发性难治/早期复发弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)患者的无事件生存(EFS);这导致其最近在美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准用于该适应证。我们通过建立一个马尔可夫模型(终生)来模拟一个假设的美国成年人队列(平均年龄 65 岁),以对二线 axi-cel 与标准治疗相比的成本效益进行建模,使用了一系列合理的长期结果。ZUMA-7 中估计了 EFS 和 OS。通过增量成本效益比报告结果,愿意支付(WTP)阈值为每质量调整生命年(QALY)15 万美元。假设二线 axi-cel 的 5 年 EFS 为 35%,SOC 为 10%,则在 WTP 为每 QALY 15 万美元时,axi-cel 具有成本效益(每 QALY 93547 美元)。如果其 5 年 EFS 小于等于 26.4%,或者如果在 WTP 为 15 万美元时成本超过 972061 美元,则 axi-cel 不再具有成本效益。在 WTP 为 15 万美元时,10000 次蒙特卡罗迭代中有 73%的情况下,二线 axi-cel 是一种具有成本效益的策略。如果 EFS 的绝对获益随时间保持,则与 SOC 相比,二线 axi-cel 用于侵袭性复发/难治性 DLBCL 在 WTP 为每 QALY 15 万美元时具有成本效益。然而,其成本效益高度依赖于长期结果。在美国,常规使用二线嵌合抗原受体 T 细胞治疗将显著增加医疗保健支出(每年超过 10 亿美元),即使在高危亚群中使用也是如此。需要进一步降低嵌合抗原受体 T 细胞治疗的成本,以便在世界许多地区负担得起。