Suppr超能文献

帕博利珠单抗联合吉西他滨和顺铂与单纯吉西他滨和顺铂治疗晚期胆道癌患者的比较(KEYNOTE-966):一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、3 期临床试验。

Pembrolizumab in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin compared with gemcitabine and cisplatin alone for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (KEYNOTE-966): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Department of Gastroenterology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan.

出版信息

Lancet. 2023 Jun 3;401(10391):1853-1865. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00727-4. Epub 2023 Apr 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Biliary tract cancers, which arise from the intrahepatic or extrahepatic bile ducts and the gallbladder, generally have a poor prognosis and are rising in incidence worldwide. The standard-of-care treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer is chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin. Because most biliary tract cancers have an immune-suppressed microenvironment, immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy is associated with a low objective response rate. We aimed to assess whether adding the immune checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab to gemcitabine and cisplatin would improve outcomes compared with gemcitabine and cisplatin alone in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer.

METHODS

KEYNOTE-966 was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial done at 175 medical centres globally. Eligible participants were aged 18 years or older; had previously untreated, unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer; had disease measurable per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1; and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Eligible participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo, both administered intravenously every 3 weeks (maximum 35 cycles), in combination with gemcitabine (1000 mg/m intravenously on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks; no maximum duration) and cisplatin (25 mg/m intravenously on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks; maximum 8 cycles). Randomisation was done using a central interactive voice-response system and stratified by geographical region, disease stage, and site of origin in block sizes of four. The primary endpoint of overall survival was evaluated in the intention-to-treat population. The secondary endpoint of safety was evaluated in the as-treated population. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04003636.

FINDINGS

Between Oct 4, 2019, and June 8, 2021, 1564 patients were screened for eligibility, 1069 of whom were randomly assigned to pembrolizumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin (pembrolizumab group; n=533) or placebo plus gemcitabine and cisplatin (placebo group; n=536). Median study follow-up at final analysis was 25·6 months (IQR 21·7-30·4). Median overall survival was 12·7 months (95% CI 11·5-13·6) in the pembrolizumab group versus 10·9 months (9·9-11·6) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·83 [95% CI 0·72-0·95]; one-sided p=0·0034 [significance threshold, p=0·0200]). In the as-treated population, the maximum adverse event grade was 3 to 4 in 420 (79%) of 529 participants in the pembrolizumab group and 400 (75%) of 534 in the placebo group; 369 (70%) participants in the pembrolizumab group and 367 (69%) in the placebo group had treatment-related adverse events with a maximum grade of 3 to 4. 31 (6%) participants in the pembrolizumab group and 49 (9%) in the placebo group died due to adverse events, including eight (2%) in the pembrolizumab group and three (1%) in the placebo group who died due to treatment-related adverse events.

INTERPRETATION

Based on a statistically significant, clinically meaningful improvement in overall survival compared with gemcitabine and cisplatin without any new safety signals, pembrolizumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin could be a new treatment option for patients with previously untreated metastatic or unresectable biliary tract cancer.

FUNDING

Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co, Rahway, NJ, USA.

摘要

背景

胆管癌起源于肝内或肝外胆管和胆囊,通常预后较差,且在全球范围内发病率呈上升趋势。晚期胆管癌的标准治疗方法是吉西他滨和顺铂化疗。由于大多数胆管癌具有免疫抑制的微环境,免疫检查点抑制剂单药治疗与客观缓解率低相关。我们旨在评估与吉西他滨和顺铂单药治疗相比,在晚期胆管癌患者中加入免疫检查点抑制剂派姆单抗是否能改善疗效。

方法

KEYNOTE-966 是一项在全球 175 个医学中心进行的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、3 期临床试验。合格的参与者年龄在 18 岁或以上;患有未经治疗、不可切除、局部晚期或转移性胆管癌;符合实体瘤反应评估标准 1.1 版可测量的疾病;东部合作肿瘤学组表现状态为 0 或 1。合格的参与者被随机分配(1:1)接受派姆单抗 200mg 或安慰剂,均每 3 周静脉输注一次(最多 35 个周期),联合吉西他滨(1000mg/m 静脉输注,第 1 天和第 8 天,每 3 周一次;无最大持续时间)和顺铂(25mg/m 静脉输注,第 1 天和第 8 天,每 3 周一次;最多 8 个周期)。随机化使用中央交互式语音应答系统进行,按地理区域、疾病阶段和起源部位分为 4 个块大小进行分层。总生存期是在意向治疗人群中评估的主要终点。安全性的次要终点是在治疗人群中评估的。这项研究在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,NCT04003636。

结果

2019 年 10 月 4 日至 2021 年 6 月 8 日期间,有 1564 名患者接受了资格筛选,其中 1069 名患者被随机分配至派姆单抗联合吉西他滨和顺铂(派姆单抗组;n=533)或安慰剂联合吉西他滨和顺铂(安慰剂组;n=536)。最后分析时的中位研究随访时间为 25.6 个月(IQR 21.7-30.4)。在派姆单抗组中位总生存期为 12.7 个月(95%CI 11.5-13.6),安慰剂组为 10.9 个月(9.9-11.6)(风险比 0.83 [95%CI 0.72-0.95];单侧 p=0.0034[显著性阈值,p=0.0200])。在治疗人群中,派姆单抗组 529 名参与者中最大不良事件等级为 3 至 4 级的有 420 名(79%),安慰剂组 534 名参与者中最大不良事件等级为 3 至 4 级的有 400 名(75%);派姆单抗组 529 名参与者中 369 名(70%)和安慰剂组 534 名参与者中 367 名(69%)发生了与治疗相关的 3 至 4 级不良事件。派姆单抗组有 31 名(6%)参与者和安慰剂组有 49 名(9%)参与者因不良事件死亡,包括派姆单抗组 8 名(2%)和安慰剂组 3 名(1%)因治疗相关不良事件死亡。

解释

与吉西他滨和顺铂相比,派姆单抗联合吉西他滨和顺铂在总生存期方面有统计学意义上的显著改善,且没有新的安全性信号,因此可能成为未经治疗的转移性或不可切除胆管癌患者的新治疗选择。

资金

默克公司的子公司默沙东 Sharp & Dohme,新泽西州 Rahway。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验