Suppr超能文献

在创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者护理中,当无法使用侵入性系统时,关于非侵入性颅内压(ICP)监测的布鲁塞尔共识(B-ICONIC共识、建议及管理算法)。

The Brussels consensus for non-invasive ICP monitoring when invasive systems are not available in the care of TBI patients (the B-ICONIC consensus, recommendations, and management algorithm).

作者信息

Robba Chiara, Picetti Edoardo, Vásquez-García Sebastián, Abulhasan Yasser B, Ain Amelia, Adeleye Amos O, Aries Marcel, Brasil Sérgio, Badenes Rafael, Bertuccio Alessandro, Bouzat Pierre, Bustamante Luis, Calabro' Lorenzo, Njimi Hassane, Cardim Danilo, Citerio Giuseppe, Czosnyka Marek, Geeraerts Thomas, Godoy Daniel A, Hirzallah Mohammad I, Devi Bhagavatula Indira, Jibaja Manuel, Lochner Piergiorgio, Mijangos Méndez Julio C, Meyfroidt Geert, Munusamy Thangaraj, Portilla Juan Pinedo, Prabhakar Hemanshu, Rasulo Frank, Sánchez Parra Diana M, Sarwal Aarti, Shrestha Gentle S, Shukla Dhaval P, Sung Gene, Tirsit Abenezer, Vásquez Franly, Videtta Walter, Wang Yu Lin, Paiva Wellingson S, Taccone Fabio Silvio, Rubiano Andres M

机构信息

IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.

Department of Surgical Science and Integrated Diagnostic, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy.

出版信息

Intensive Care Med. 2025 Jan;51(1):4-20. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07756-2. Epub 2025 Jan 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Invasive systems are commonly used for monitoring intracranial pressure (ICP) in traumatic brain injury (TBI) and are considered the gold standard. The availability of invasive ICP monitoring is heterogeneous, and in low- and middle-income settings, these systems are not routinely employed due to high cost or limited accessibility. The aim of this consensus was to develop recommendations to guide monitoring and ICP-driven therapies in TBI using non-invasive ICP (nICP) systems.

METHODS

A panel of 41 experts, that regularly use nICP systems for guiding TBI care, was established. Three scoping and four systematic reviews with meta-analysis were performed summarizing the current global-literature evidence. A modified Delphi method was applied for the development of recommendations. An in-person meeting with group discussions and voting was conducted. Strong recommendations were defined for an agreement of at least 85%. Weak recommendations were defined for an agreement of 75-85%.

RESULTS

A total of 34 recommendations were provided (32 Strong, 2 Weak) divided into three domains: general consideration for nICP use, management of ICP using nICP methods and thresholds of nICP tools for escalating/de-escalating treatment. We developed four clinical algorithms for escalating treatment and heatmaps for de-escalating treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a mixed-method approach involving literature review and an in-person consensus by experts, a set of recommendations designed to assist clinicians managing TBI patients using nICP systems plus clinical assessment, in the presence or absence of brain imaging, were built. Further clinical studies are required to validate the potential use of these recommendations in the daily clinical practice.

摘要

背景

有创系统常用于监测创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者的颅内压(ICP),被视为金标准。有创ICP监测的可及性存在差异,在低收入和中等收入地区,由于成本高昂或可及性有限,这些系统未被常规使用。本共识的目的是制定建议,以指导使用无创ICP(nICP)系统监测TBI及进行基于ICP的治疗。

方法

成立了一个由41位专家组成的小组,这些专家经常使用nICP系统指导TBI的治疗。进行了三项范围界定综述和四项带有荟萃分析的系统综述,总结当前全球文献证据。采用改良的德尔菲法制定建议。召开了一次面对面会议,进行小组讨论和投票。至少85%的一致意见被定义为强烈建议。75%-85%的一致意见被定义为弱建议。

结果

共提供了34条建议(32条强烈建议,2条弱建议),分为三个领域:nICP使用的一般考虑、使用nICP方法管理ICP以及nICP工具用于升级/降级治疗的阈值。我们制定了四项升级治疗的临床算法和降级治疗的热图。

结论

采用文献综述和专家面对面达成共识的混合方法,构建了一套建议,旨在帮助临床医生在有或没有脑成像的情况下,使用nICP系统及临床评估来管理TBI患者。需要进一步的临床研究来验证这些建议在日常临床实践中的潜在用途。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验