Infections and Immunoepidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, DHHS, 6120 Executive Blvd, EPS, Room 7079, Rockville, MD 20852, USA.
Sex Transm Dis. 2010 Nov;37(11):706-14. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3181e1a2c5.
Serological indicators of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection are being used to differentiate HPV-naïve from previously infected women in vaccine and epidemiologic/clinical studies. We investigated HPV16 and 18 seroepidemiology among young, unvaccinated women aged between 18 and 25.
We conducted a cross-sectional evaluation of the enrollment visit in the ongoing community-based HPV16/18 Costa Rica Vaccine Trial. Prevaccination serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies were measured against HPV16 and HPV18 by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; cervical samples were tested for HPV DNA using Hybrid Capture 2 and SPF10/LiPA25. Seroprevalence and its correlates were evaluated using unconditional logistic regression.
Among 5871 nonvirginal women, HPV16 and 18 seroprevalences were 30.8% and 28.1%, HPV16 and HPV18 DNA prevalences were 8.3% and 3.2%, respectively. About 37% of HPV16 DNA-positives and 42% of HPV18 DNA-positives were seronegative. Seroprevalence increased with time since sexual debut, whereas DNA prevalence did not. The correlates of HPV16 and/or 18 seropositivity were related to sexual behaviors, particularly higher number of lifetime sexual partners. There was no evidence of assay cross-reactivity as HPV16 seroprevalence was similar (approximately 34%) among women singly infected with genetically and nongenetically related species (α9 and non-α9); likewise, seropositivity to HPV18 was similar (approximately 30%) among women singly infected with α7 and non-α7 species.
The increasing seroprevalence observed with time since first sex suggests that HPV serology is a cumulative marker of HPV exposure. However, many DNA infected women were seronegative; thus, serology is an imperfect measure of past exposure to cervical HPV, at best. Additionally, we found no evidence of assay cross-reactivity.
血清学指标人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)感染正被用于区分 HPV 初免与既往感染妇女在疫苗和流行病学/临床研究。我们调查了 HPV16 和 18 血清流行病学在年轻的,未接种疫苗的妇女年龄在 18 至 25 岁之间。
我们进行了一项横断面评价在正在进行的基于社区的 HPV16/18 哥斯达黎加疫苗试验中的入组访视。在酶联免疫吸附试验之前用 HPV16 和 HPV18 测量血清免疫球蛋白 G(IgG)抗体;宫颈样本使用杂交捕获 2 和 SPF10/LiPA25 进行 HPV DNA 检测。采用非条件逻辑回归评估血清流行率及其相关因素。
在 5871 例非处女妇女中,HPV16 和 18 血清流行率分别为 30.8%和 28.1%,HPV16 和 HPV18 DNA 流行率分别为 8.3%和 3.2%。约 37%的 HPV16 DNA 阳性和 42%的 HPV18 DNA 阳性者血清学阴性。血清流行率随首次性行为后时间的增加而增加,而 DNA 流行率则不然。HPV16 和/或 18 血清阳性的相关因素与性行为有关,特别是性伴侣数量较多。没有证据表明检测存在交叉反应,因为 HPV16 血清流行率在单一感染遗传和非遗传相关种(α9 和非-α9)的妇女中相似(约 34%);同样,HPV18 血清阳性率在单一感染 α7 和非-α7 种的妇女中相似(约 30%)。
随着首次性行为后时间的增加而观察到的血清流行率增加表明 HPV 血清学是 HPV 暴露的累积标志物。然而,许多 DNA 感染的妇女血清学阴性;因此,血清学最多是过去宫颈 HPV 暴露的不完美衡量标准。此外,我们没有发现检测存在交叉反应的证据。