Division of Pediatric Neurology, University Children's Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Division of Neurology, Medical University Clinic, Kantonsspital Baselland, Bruderholz, Switzerland.
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Oct 2;2(10):e1914171. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.14171.
Nitric oxide precursors, such as the amino acid l-arginine and the biguanide antidiabetic drug metformin, have been associated with metabolism and muscle function in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). The treatment of DMD remains an unmet medical need.
To evaluate the benefits and harms of a combination of l-citrulline and metformin treatment among patients with DMD.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A single-center randomized double-blind placebo-controlled parallel-group clinical trial was conducted between December 12, 2013, and March 30, 2016, at the University Children's Hospital Basel in Switzerland. A total of 47 ambulant male patients aged 6.5 to 10 years with genetically confirmed DMD were recruited locally and from the patient registries of Switzerland, Germany, Austria, and France. Data were analyzed from April 6, 2016, to September 5, 2019.
Patients in the treatment group received 2500 mg of l-citrulline and 250 mg of metformin (combination therapy) 3 times a day for 26 weeks compared with patients in the control group, who received placebo.
The primary end point was the change in transfer and standing posture, as assessed by the first dimension of the Motor Function Measure, version 32, from baseline to week 26. Secondary end points included assessments of timed function, quantitative muscle force, biomarkers for muscle necrosis, and adverse events. The 2 prespecified subgroups comprised patients who were able to walk 350 m or more in 6 minutes (stable subgroup) and patients who were not able to walk 350 m in 6 minutes (unstable subgroup) at baseline.
Among 49 ambulant male children with DMD who were screened for eligibility, 47 patients with a mean (SD) age of 8.2 (1.1) years were randomized to a treatment group receiving combination therapy (n = 23) or a control group receiving placebo (n = 24), and 45 patients completed the study. No significant differences between groups were found in the results of timed function and muscle force tests for overall, proximal and axial, and distal motor function. Among patients receiving combination therapy, the Motor Function Measure first dimension subscore decrease was 5.5% greater than that of patients receiving placebo (95% CI, -1.0% to 12.1%; P = .09). The administration of combination therapy had significantly favorable effects on the first dimension subscore decrease among the 29 patients in the stable subgroup (6.7%; 95% CI, 0.9%-12.6%; P = .03) but not among the 15 patients in the unstable subgroup (3.9%; 95% CI, -13.2% to 20.9%; P = .63). Overall, the treatment was well tolerated with only mild adverse effects.
Treatment with combination therapy was not associated with an overall reduction in motor function decline among ambulant patients with DMD; however, a reduction in motor function decline was observed among the stable subgroup of patients treated with combination therapy. The statistically nonsignificant difference of distal motor function in favor of combination therapy and the reduced degeneration of muscle tissue appear to support the treatment concept, but the study may have lacked sufficient statistical power. Further research exploring this treatment option with a greater number of patients is warranted.
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01995032.
一氧化氮前体,如氨基酸 l-精氨酸和双胍类抗糖尿病药物二甲双胍,与杜氏肌营养不良症(DMD)患者的代谢和肌肉功能有关。DMD 的治疗仍然是一个未满足的医疗需求。
评估 l-瓜氨酸和二甲双胍联合治疗 DMD 患者的益处和危害。
设计、设置和参与者:这是一项单中心随机双盲安慰剂对照平行组临床试验,于 2013 年 12 月 12 日至 2016 年 3 月 30 日在瑞士巴塞尔大学儿童医院进行。共招募了 47 名年龄在 6.5 至 10 岁之间、经基因证实患有 DMD 的男性门诊患者,他们来自瑞士、德国、奥地利和法国的患者登记处。数据于 2016 年 4 月 6 日至 2019 年 9 月 5 日进行分析。
治疗组患者每天接受 2500 毫克 l-瓜氨酸和 250 毫克二甲双胍(联合治疗)3 次,共 26 周,而对照组患者则接受安慰剂。
主要终点是第 32 版运动功能测量的第一维度的变化,从基线到 26 周。次要终点包括计时功能、定量肌肉力量、肌肉坏死生物标志物和不良事件的评估。2 个预设亚组包括基线时能够在 6 分钟内行走 350 米或以上(稳定亚组)和不能在 6 分钟内行走 350 米(不稳定亚组)的患者。
在筛选出的 49 名适合的男性 DMD 患儿中,有 47 名患儿的平均(SD)年龄为 8.2(1.1)岁,随机分为治疗组接受联合治疗(n=23)或对照组接受安慰剂(n=24),并完成了研究的 45 名患儿。在整体、近端和轴向以及远端运动功能的计时功能和肌肉力量测试中,两组之间未发现显著差异。与接受安慰剂的患儿相比,接受联合治疗的患儿运动功能测量第一维度的评分下降幅度大 5.5%(95% CI,-1.0%至 12.1%;P=0.09)。在 29 名稳定亚组患儿中,联合治疗对第一维度评分下降的影响显著优于安慰剂(6.7%;95% CI,0.9%-12.6%;P=0.03),但在 15 名不稳定亚组患儿中无此作用(3.9%;95% CI,-13.2%至 20.9%;P=0.63)。总体而言,治疗耐受性良好,仅有轻微不良反应。
联合治疗并未降低 DMD 门诊患者的整体运动功能下降速度;然而,在接受联合治疗的稳定亚组患者中,运动功能下降速度有所下降。有利于联合治疗的远端运动功能的统计学上无显著差异和肌肉组织的退化减少似乎支持了治疗概念,但研究可能缺乏足够的统计效力。需要进一步研究,以更大的患者数量探索这种治疗选择。
ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT01995032。