College of Pharmacy, Ewha Womans University, Seoul 03760, Korea.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 28;19(19):12366. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912366.
Although chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has shown a high response rate in lymphoma patients, its cost-effectiveness is controversial due to the high price and uncertainty of the clinical evidence. In addition to the high acquisition cost of CAR T-cell therapy, procedure and facility cost increase the financial burden considering the frequency of adverse events such as cytokine release syndrome. In clinical research, relatively short follow-up periods were used compared to traditional cancer agents. In addition, head-to-head comparative effectiveness data are unavailable, which is an important factor when evaluating the cost-effectiveness of a new treatment. Additional evidence that will compensate for the uncertainty of existing clinical data is needed for full evaluation of long-term efficacy, safety, and comparative effectiveness.
尽管嵌合抗原受体 (CAR) T 细胞疗法在淋巴瘤患者中显示出了高应答率,但由于其高昂的价格和临床证据的不确定性,其成本效益仍存在争议。除了 CAR T 细胞疗法的高昂获取成本外,考虑到细胞因子释放综合征等不良事件的发生频率,程序和设施成本也会增加经济负担。在临床研究中,与传统癌症药物相比,使用的随访时间相对较短。此外,缺乏头对头的比较有效性数据,这是评估新治疗方法成本效益的重要因素。需要更多的证据来弥补现有临床数据的不确定性,以全面评估长期疗效、安全性和比较有效性。