Emergency Medicine Department, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Level 4, National University Centre for Oral Health Singapore (NUCOHS), 9 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119085, Singapore.
Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Tower Block, 1E Kent Ridge Road Level 8, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2024 Oct 29;13(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s13756-024-01481-7.
We examined the effectiveness of an antimicrobial surface coating for continual disinfection of high touch-frequency surfaces in the emergency department (ED).
Following a preliminary observation identifying stretcher rails as the surface with highest touch-frequency in the ED, we conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial involving 96 stretcher rails. The stretchers were randomized to receive an antimicrobial surface coating or placebo coating. Routine cleaning of stretchers subsequently continued as per hospital protocol in both arms. Sampling for total aerobic, gram-positive halophilic, gram-negative and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteria was performed pre- and post-treatment at 24 h, 7 days and 180 days. Individuals who applied the coating and outcome assessors were blinded to the allocated arms. The primary outcome is contamination of antimicrobial versus placebo rails measured as colony forming units per cm(CFU/cm).
Baseline total aerobic bacteria was comparable between placebo and intervention arms (0.84 versus 1.32 CFU/cm, P = 0.235). Total aerobic bacteria contamination was significantly lower on antimicrobial versus placebo rails at 24 h (0.61 versus 1.01 CFU/cm, median difference 0.40 CFU/cm, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.01 to 1.01 CFU/cm). There was a non-statistically significant tendency for contamination to be lower on antimicrobial versus placebo rails at 7 days (1.15 versus 1.50 CFU/cm, median difference 0.35 CFU/cm, 95% CI -0.64 to 1.28 CFU/cm), but higher at 180 days (2.06 versus 1.84 CFU/cm, median difference - 0.22 CFU/cm, 95% CI -1.19 to 0.78 CFU/cm).
This is the first double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized trial to evaluate an antimicrobial surface coating on high touch-frequency surfaces in the emergency department. Total aerobic bacteria found on antimicrobial-coated patient transport stretcher rails was significantly lower than placebo rails at 24 h.
我们研究了一种抗菌表面涂层在急诊部门(ED)持续消毒高频接触表面的效果。
在初步观察确定担架轨道是 ED 中接触频率最高的表面之后,我们进行了一项涉及 96 个担架的试点随机对照试验。这些担架被随机分配接受抗菌表面涂层或安慰剂涂层。在两个臂中,随后按照医院的方案继续进行常规的担架清洁。在治疗前、治疗后 24 小时、7 天和 180 天,对总需氧菌、革兰阳性嗜盐菌、革兰阴性菌和耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌进行采样。应用涂层的个体和结果评估者对分配的臂不知情。主要结果是抗菌与安慰剂轨道的污染,以每平方厘米的菌落形成单位(CFU/cm)测量。
安慰剂和干预组的基线总需氧菌相似(0.84 与 1.32 CFU/cm,P=0.235)。与安慰剂轨道相比,抗菌轨道在 24 小时时总需氧菌污染明显较低(0.61 与 1.01 CFU/cm,中位数差异 0.40 CFU/cm,95%置信区间 [CI] 0.01 至 1.01 CFU/cm)。在 7 天时,抗菌轨道与安慰剂轨道相比,污染倾向于较低(1.15 与 1.50 CFU/cm,中位数差异 0.35 CFU/cm,95% CI -0.64 至 1.28 CFU/cm),但在 180 天时,污染更高(2.06 与 1.84 CFU/cm,中位数差异 -0.22 CFU/cm,95% CI -1.19 至 0.78 CFU/cm)。
这是第一项评估急诊部门高频接触表面抗菌表面涂层的双盲、安慰剂对照、随机试验。在 24 小时时,在抗菌涂层的患者转运担架上发现的总需氧菌明显低于安慰剂轨道。