Department of Infectious Diseases and Respiratory Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive care, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 18;10(10):CD015045. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015045.
The development of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and poor clinical outcomes are associated with hyperinflammation and a complex dysregulation of the immune response. Colchicine is an anti-inflammatory medicine and is thought to improve disease outcomes in COVID-19 through a wide range of anti-inflammatory mechanisms. Patients and healthcare systems need more and better treatment options for COVID-19 and a thorough understanding of the current body of evidence.
To assess the effectiveness and safety of Colchicine as a treatment option for COVID-19 in comparison to an active comparator, placebo, or standard care alone in any setting, and to maintain the currency of the evidence, using a living systematic review approach.
We searched the Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register (comprising CENTRAL, MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and medRxiv), Web of Science (Science Citation Index Expanded and Emerging Sources Citation Index), and WHO COVID-19 Global literature on coronavirus disease to identify completed and ongoing studies without language restrictions to 21 May 2021.
We included randomised controlled trials evaluating colchicine for the treatment of people with COVID-19, irrespective of disease severity, age, sex, or ethnicity. We excluded studies investigating the prophylactic effects of colchicine for people without severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection but at high risk of SARS-CoV-2 exposure.
We followed standard Cochrane methodology. We used the Cochrane risk of bias tool (ROB 2) to assess bias in included studies and GRADE to rate the certainty of evidence for the following prioritised outcome categories considering people with moderate or severe COVID-19: all-cause mortality, worsening and improvement of clinical status, quality of life, adverse events, and serious adverse events and for people with asymptomatic infection or mild disease: all-cause mortality, admission to hospital or death, symptom resolution, duration to symptom resolution, quality of life, adverse events, serious adverse events.
We included three RCTs with 11,525 hospitalised participants (8002 male) and one RCT with 4488 (2067 male) non-hospitalised participants. Mean age of people treated in hospital was about 64 years, and was 55 years in the study with non-hospitalised participants. Further, we identified 17 ongoing studies and 11 studies completed or terminated, but without published results. Colchicine plus standard care versus standard care (plus/minus placebo) Treatment of hospitalised people with moderate to severe COVID-19 All-cause mortality: colchicine plus standard care probably results in little to no difference in all-cause mortality up to 28 days compared to standard care alone (risk ratio (RR) 1.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.93 to 1.08; 2 RCTs, 11,445 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Worsening of clinical status: colchicine plus standard care probably results in little to no difference in worsening of clinical status assessed as new need for invasive mechanical ventilation or death compared to standard care alone (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.09; 2 RCTs, 10,916 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Improvement of clinical status: colchicine plus standard care probably results in little to no difference in improvement of clinical status, assessed as number of participants discharged alive up to day 28 without clinical deterioration or death compared to standard care alone (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.01; 1 RCT, 11,340 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Quality of life, including fatigue and neurological status: we identified no studies reporting this outcome. Adverse events: the evidence is very uncertain about the effect of colchicine on adverse events compared to placebo (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.78; 1 RCT, 72 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Serious adverse events: the evidence is very uncertain about the effect of colchicine plus standard care on serious adverse events compared to standard care alone (0 events observed in 1 RCT of 105 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Treatment of non-hospitalised people with asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection or mild COVID-19 All-cause mortality: the evidence is uncertain about the effect of colchicine on all-cause mortality at 28 days (Peto odds ratio (OR) 0.57, 95% CI 0.20 to 1.62; 1 RCT, 4488 participants; low-certainty evidence). Admission to hospital or death within 28 days: colchicine probably slightly reduces the need for hospitalisation or death within 28 days compared to placebo (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.03; 1 RCT, 4488 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Symptom resolution: we identified no studies reporting this outcome. Quality of life, including fatigue and neurological status: we identified no studies reporting this outcome. Adverse events: the evidence is uncertain about the effect of colchicine on adverse events compared to placebo . Results are from one RCT reporting treatment-related events only in 4412 participants (low-certainty evidence). Serious adverse events: colchicine probably slightly reduces serious adverse events (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.00; 1 RCT, 4412 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Colchicine versus another active treatment (e.g. corticosteroids, anti-viral drugs, monoclonal antibodies) No studies evaluated this comparison. Different formulations, doses, or schedules of colchicine No studies assessed this.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Based on the current evidence, in people hospitalised with moderate to severe COVID-19 the use of colchicine probably has little to no influence on mortality or clinical progression in comparison to placebo or standard care alone. We do not know whether colchicine increases the risk of (serious) adverse events. We are uncertain about the evidence of the effect of colchicine on all-cause mortality for people with asymptomatic infection or mild disease. However, colchicine probably results in a slight reduction of hospital admissions or deaths within 28 days, and the rate of serious adverse events compared with placebo. None of the studies reported data on quality of life or compared the benefits and harms of colchicine versus other drugs, or different dosages of colchicine. We identified 17 ongoing and 11 completed but not published RCTs, which we expect to incorporate in future versions of this review as their results become available. Editorial note: due to the living approach of this work, we monitor newly published results of RCTs on colchicine on a weekly basis and will update the review when the evidence or our certainty in the evidence changes.
严重的 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的发展和不良临床结局与过度炎症和免疫反应的复杂失调有关。秋水仙碱是一种抗炎药物,被认为通过广泛的抗炎机制改善 COVID-19 的疾病结局。患者和医疗保健系统需要更多和更好的 COVID-19 治疗选择,并且需要彻底了解当前的证据。
使用一种基于活系统评价的方法,评估秋水仙碱作为 COVID-19 治疗选择的有效性和安全性,与活性对照、安慰剂或单独标准护理相比,适用于任何环境,并且保持证据的时效性。
我们检索了 Cochrane COVID-19 研究注册库(包括 CENTRAL、MEDLINE(PubMed)、Embase、ClinicalTrials.gov、世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台和 medRxiv)、Web of Science(科学引文索引扩展版和新兴来源引文索引)和世界卫生组织 COVID-19 全球冠状病毒疾病文献,以确定截至 2021 年 5 月 21 日完成和正在进行的研究,无语言限制。
我们纳入了评估秋水仙碱治疗 COVID-19 患者的随机对照试验,无论疾病严重程度、年龄、性别或种族如何。我们排除了研究秋水仙碱对无严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)感染但有 SARS-CoV-2 暴露高风险人群的预防性影响的研究。
我们遵循了标准的 Cochrane 方法。我们使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具(ROB 2)评估纳入研究中的偏倚,并使用 GRADE 评估以下优先结局类别的证据确定性:中度或重度 COVID-19 患者的全因死亡率、临床状况恶化和改善、生活质量、不良事件和严重不良事件;以及无症状感染或轻症患者的全因死亡率、住院或死亡、症状缓解、症状缓解持续时间、生活质量、不良事件、严重不良事件。
我们纳入了三项涉及 11525 名住院患者(8002 名男性)的 RCT 和一项涉及 4488 名(2067 名男性)非住院患者的 RCT。住院患者的平均年龄约为 64 岁,非住院患者的平均年龄为 55 岁。此外,我们还确定了 17 项正在进行的研究和 11 项已完成或终止但未发表结果的研究。秋水仙碱联合标准治疗与标准治疗(加/不加安慰剂)比较治疗中重度 COVID-19 患者的全因死亡率:与单独使用标准治疗相比,秋水仙碱联合标准治疗可能在 28 天内对全因死亡率几乎没有影响(风险比(RR)1.00,95%置信区间(CI)0.93 至 1.08;2 项 RCT,11445 名参与者;中等确定性证据)。临床状况恶化:与单独使用标准治疗相比,秋水仙碱联合标准治疗可能对新需要接受有创机械通气或死亡的临床状况恶化几乎没有影响(RR 1.02,95%CI 0.96 至 1.09;2 项 RCT,10916 名参与者;中等确定性证据)。临床状况改善:与单独使用标准治疗相比,秋水仙碱联合标准治疗可能对临床状况改善几乎没有影响,评估为 28 天内无临床恶化或死亡的存活参与者出院人数增加(RR 0.99,95%CI 0.96 至 1.01;1 项 RCT,11340 名参与者;中等确定性证据)。生活质量,包括疲劳和神经状态:我们没有发现报告这一结果的研究。不良事件:与安慰剂相比,秋水仙碱对不良事件的影响证据非常不确定(RR 1.00,95%CI 0.56 至 1.78;1 项 RCT,72 名参与者;非常低确定性证据)。严重不良事件:与单独使用标准治疗相比,秋水仙碱联合标准治疗对严重不良事件的影响证据非常不确定(0 例事件观察到 105 名参与者的 1 项 RCT;非常低确定性证据)。治疗无症状 SARS-CoV-2 感染或轻症 COVID-19 患者的全因死亡率:秋水仙碱对 28 天全因死亡率的影响证据不确定(Peto 比值比(OR)0.57,95%CI 0.20 至 1.62;1 项 RCT,4488 名参与者;低确定性证据)。28 天内住院或死亡:与安慰剂相比,秋水仙碱可能略微降低 28 天内住院或死亡的需求(RR 0.80,95%CI 0.62 至 1.03;1 项 RCT,4488 名参与者;中等确定性证据)。症状缓解:我们没有发现报告这一结果的研究。生活质量,包括疲劳和神经状态:我们没有发现报告这一结果的研究。不良事件:与安慰剂相比,秋水仙碱对不良事件的影响证据不确定。结果来自一项仅在 4412 名参与者中报告治疗相关事件的 RCT(低确定性证据)。严重不良事件:与安慰剂相比,秋水仙碱可能会略微降低严重不良事件(RR 0.78,95%CI 0.61 至 1.00;1 项 RCT,4412 名参与者;中等确定性证据)。秋水仙碱与其他活性治疗(如皮质类固醇、抗病毒药物、单克隆抗体)比较:没有研究评估这种比较。不同的制剂、剂量或秋水仙碱的方案:没有研究评估这一点。
根据目前的证据,在患有中重度 COVID-19 的住院患者中,与安慰剂或单独使用标准治疗相比,秋水仙碱的使用可能对死亡率或临床进展几乎没有影响。我们不知道秋水仙碱是否会增加(严重)不良事件的风险。我们对无症状感染或轻症患者的秋水仙碱对全因死亡率的影响证据不确定。然而,与安慰剂相比,秋水仙碱可能会轻微降低 28 天内的住院或死亡人数,以及严重不良事件的发生率。没有研究报告关于生活质量或比较秋水仙碱与其他药物或不同剂量秋水仙碱的数据。我们确定了 17 项正在进行的和 11 项已完成但未发表的 RCT,我们预计随着这些研究结果的公布,将在未来的版本中纳入这些研究。编辑注意:由于这项工作采用了活的方法,我们每周监测 RCT 中关于秋水仙碱的新结果,并将在证据或我们对证据的确定性发生变化时更新本综述。