Biology of Aging Working Group, Department of Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases (Including Division of Lipid Metabolism), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Department of Psychology, Humboldt University Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Geroscience. 2022 Jun;44(3):1847-1859. doi: 10.1007/s11357-022-00581-9. Epub 2022 May 13.
Adverse effects of low vitamin D level on mortality and morbidity are controversially discussed. Especially older people are at risk for vitamin D deficiency and therefore exposed to its potentially harmful consequences. A way of measuring differences in the biological age is through DNA methylation age (DNAm age) and its deviation from chronological age, DNAm age acceleration (DNAmAA). We previously reported on an association between vitamin D deficiency and higher 7-CpG DNAmAA in participants of the Berlin Aging Study II (BASE-II). In this study, we employ a quasi-interventional study design to assess the relationship between DNAmAA of five epigenetic clocks and vitamin D supplementation. Longitudinal data were available for 1,036 participants of BASE-II that were reexamined on average 7.4 years later in the GendAge study (mean age at follow-up: 75.6 years, SD = 3.8 years, age range: 64.9-94.1 years, 51.9% female). DNAmAA was estimated with the 7-CpG clock, Horvath's clock, Hannum's clock, PhenoAge, and GrimAge. Methylation data were obtained through methylation-sensitive single nucleotide primer extension (MS-SNuPE) or Illumina's Infinium "MethylationEPIC" array. Vitamin D-deficient participants who chose to start vitamin D supplementation after baseline examination showed a 2.6-year lower 7-CpG DNAmAA (p = 0.011) and 1.3-year lower Horvath DNAmAA (p = 0.042) compared to untreated and vitamin D-deficient participants. DNAmAA did not statistically differ between participants with successfully treated vitamin D deficiency and healthy controls (p > 0.16). Therefore, we conclude that intake of vitamin D supplement is associated with lower DNAmAA in participants with vitamin D deficiency.
维生素 D 水平低对死亡率和发病率的不良影响存在争议。特别是老年人有维生素 D 缺乏的风险,因此易受其潜在有害影响的影响。一种衡量生物年龄差异的方法是通过 DNA 甲基化年龄(DNAm 年龄)及其与实际年龄的偏差,即 DNAm 年龄加速(DNAmAA)。我们之前曾报道过维生素 D 缺乏与柏林衰老研究 II 期(BASE-II)参与者中更高的 7-CpG DNAmAA 之间存在关联。在这项研究中,我们采用准干预性研究设计来评估五个表观遗传时钟的 DNAmAA 与维生素 D 补充之间的关系。BASE-II 的 1036 名参与者有纵向数据,他们在平均 7.4 年后在 GendAge 研究中再次接受检查(随访时的平均年龄:75.6 岁,标准差=3.8 岁,年龄范围:64.9-94.1 岁,女性占 51.9%)。使用 7-CpG 时钟、Horvath 时钟、Hannum 时钟、PhenoAge 和 GrimAge 估计 DNAmAA。通过甲基化敏感单核苷酸引物延伸(MS-SNuPE)或 Illumina 的 Infinium“MethylationEPIC”阵列获得甲基化数据。基线检查后选择开始维生素 D 补充的维生素 D 缺乏参与者,其 7-CpG DNAmAA 低 2.6 岁(p=0.011),Horvath DNAmAA 低 1.3 岁(p=0.042)与未治疗和维生素 D 缺乏的参与者相比。成功治疗维生素 D 缺乏症的参与者和健康对照组之间的 DNAmAA 没有统计学差异(p>0.16)。因此,我们得出结论,维生素 D 补充剂的摄入与维生素 D 缺乏症参与者的 DNAmAA 降低有关。